Wer so alles Glyphosat produziert, könnt ihr z. B. hier nachlesen:
http://news.agropages.com/News/NewsDetail---24149.htmhttp://www.agropages.com/CompanyDirectory/CList-----glyphosate-1.htmEben hab ich auf der ECHA-Seite, wo die Kommentare zur Glyphosat-Bewertung stehen,
dieses Dokument gefunden.
Zitat:
"The discussion about Glyphosate in the EU is not a scientific discussion, but the result of
lobbying for the chemical industry, and in particular by the glyphosate producers:
Monsanto, Syngenta, BAYER AG, BASF and others. This is not a secret but a well-known
and researched fact in the public media. I am not a scientist nor a member of a NGO or in
any way related to the chemical industry but a very concerned consumer from Germany
who researched a lot about this topic. I am not a biologist nor a natural scientist and
probably don’t use the toxicological or scientific terms correctly, but I have attached and
cited all the resources for my arguments and complaints"
Und aus den Schlussfolgerungen:
"The European administrations, WHO, Efsa, FAO, BfR et al. and the scientists who claim
that glyphosate is non-toxic to humans, animals and the ecosystem are heavily under the
influence of the glyphosate producers. ...
The studies paid for and by the glyphosate producers have to be carefully re-evaluated by
a group of independent researchers. The independent glyphosate studies must be reevaluated
in search for all proven effects on the human body, animals and the ecosystem
by an independent authority, where GMO and glyphosate experts and critics from
environmental NGOs work together."
... wir müssen die gesamte Zulassung von PSM neu regeln und nur noch "Bio-Pestizide" oder gar keine PSM mehr zulassen.
Und zwar auf Basis unabhängiger Studien unabhängiger Wissenschaftler, über deren Unabhängigkeit wir - und nur wir - entscheiden.
Eben. Motto: Traue keinem Experten, der nicht deiner Meinung ist.